WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » Politicians & Politics » Taxes (RSS)

Related Tags

Village Board Selects New Trustee Clone --- Big Project Loving Tax and Spender

By David Tatarowicz
Sunday, Jun 22 2008, 02:16 PM

 Deciding not to let the voters of Shorewood elect a trustee to replace Phinney who resigned his seat, the Village Board interviewed 12 applicants ..........

 

( I believe none of the twelve have ever subjected themselves to the bright light of the election process and found this back door way to office to be more palatable !)

 

The Village Board Members selected Sean Cummings, who is the co-chair of the D2D Committee. 

 

The D2D project, replacing the SHS natural field with an artificial field, and possibly adding a big dome for winter, was touted as a private contribution project that would cost in the $3 million range.

 

The "private contribution" aspect of the project may have been well intentioned at first, but the D2D Committee, with Sean Cummings in the lead, quickly acquired about $1 million in taxpayer money from the School District, the Village Board and the CDA.

 

In the meantime ---  the School Board is cutting back programs like music, arts and languages, and is trying to figure out which school building to close for the lack of students and money  ..........

 

Mr Cummings should fit right in with the present Board Trustees, who have a penchant for overlooking the mundane every day needs of the Village of Shorewood, for the bright lights and glamour of the Big Dollar Projects.

 

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ?  PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT BELOW ! 



 

I Nominate Neutron Jack for Shorewood School Board President

By David Tatarowicz
Saturday, Feb 2 2008, 12:31 PM

During the Cold War, there was a real possibility of armed conflict between the NATO Forces and the Warsaw Pact Forces.

Among other considerations if such a conflict occurred, was that the battleground would have been in Europe, with a fairly dense population living in cities.

Having recently gone through the nearly total destruction of many European cities in WWII, NATO Forces developed a nifty little nuclear bomb (called the Neutron Bomb) that killed people with radiation, while leaving the buildings standing! 

Fortunately in the political and military world, the conflagration in Europe did not happen (albeit due to millions of lives lost in various wars fought by the surrogate forces of the Super Powers and the threat of MAD - Mutual Assured Destruction ) .

But in the business world, Jack Welch the former CEO of GE  earned the nickname of ''Neutron Jack,'' due to a series of dramatic restructurings and layoffs he instituted, that cut over 100,000 jobs - cuts that  were so painful to employees that they began referring to him as  ''Neutron Jack,'' after the nuclear bomb that vaporizes people but leaves buildings standing.

Soooooooo about now, you are asking yourself "just what does Jack Welch or neutron bombs have to do with Shorewood Schools "?

The Connection between them became apparent to me as I contemplated the Dis-Connect of the messages that the Shorewood School Board has been sending to us over the past few months.

Just last September (07) the School Board was saying that we have to seriously look at closing a school due to falling enrollment. 

From an article by Dave Fidlin,  dfidlin@cninow.com published September 5, 2007 :

Shorewood school closing possible

Reconfiguration scenarios created for district

Dropping enrollment

http://www.shorewoodnow.com/story/index.aspx?id=657702

"Based on its examination, administration found that the district's four schools are currently at 75 to 80 percent capacity. By 2010-11, those figures could dip to 65 to 70 percent if the schools were to stay as is."

One of the options discussed was closing the Middle School. Superintendent Blane McCann said  "If the district were to close SIS, it could result in a savings of $622,000 in operational and staffing expenses." 

At the time, the School Board was of the opinion that it needed to go slow in reviewing the options and doing more research before taking action.

Back then Board  Member Paul Zovic said "I think we need to have some real numbers for all these options -- These are big decisions. We're not in planning mode."

Superintendent Blane McCann was quoted as saying "I would advocate careful planning,"

But now - barely 5 months later --  the School Board is asking for about $10,000,000 from Shorewood Taxpayers to Remodel and Upgrade the schools !

The message we now hear from the Shorewood School Board members is one of Urgency!  We need $10 Million NOW!

As quoted in http://www.shorewoodnow.com/  January 30, 2008:

"Board member Paul Zovic said he favored investing in the technology upgrades, for which the district will ask for $1 million.  (It is) something we not only haven't been keeping up with, but have been chiseling away"

"We're addressing some really, really old problems," board member Michael Mishlove said. "We're dealing with infrastructure that is ancient relative to the rest of the state. We need to take action. We can't hand it down to the next generation."

"Superintendent Blane McCann said there would be some reconfiguration of the north gym, with lockers and classrooms in new areas. The library remodeling, meanwhile, would encompass the construction of stadium seating and modifications to the computer lab. "

BTW (by the way) --- the School Board decided to request $9.65 million from taxpayers in a referendum, as "During deliberations, a consensus was reached that a referendum of less than $10 million would stand a greater chance of being approved by constituents."

I Am Wondering What Happened To The Slow And Steady Approach Of 5 Months Ago That Was Concerned With Dropping Enrollment And The Need For Consolidation --- And Taking Actions That Are Well Thought Out And Will Address The Future As Well As The Present ?????

Is the School Board "Neutroning" our schools?  We have already eliminated clerical, maintenance and librarian personnel among others --- and our student population is on a decline (in part from the inability of school age families to pay Shorewood taxes??).

 The student population that we do have is highly dependent upon Open Enrollment and Chapter 220 Students --- both programs which are vulnerable to the vagaries of political action in Madison and the decisions by the Courts!

The Village of Shorewood and the Shorewood School District are inextricably linked and co-dependent.  If the Shorewood Schools develop a cough, the Village gets the flu, and when the village has a temperature, the schools develop a fever.

We currently have a Village Board that is betting the economic future of the Village, with a plan that in a flat realty market could backfire into big time loses for the taxpayers.

 In one scheme the Village Board  is looking at, it will pay  duplex property owners to convert their buildings to single family residences, making living in Shorewood even less affordable --- and further diminishing the student population.

 Now the School Board wants to spend $10 million on buildings that are under-utilized, and may become more so, as families with children cannot afford Shorewood's taxes.

As our good friend and fellow blogger Joe Mangiamele wrote in his  Spirit of Shorewood blog on Monday, Jan 28 2008 

"We have acquired stacks of stodgy documents called plans, none interrelated nor integrated nor linked  to each other within a spirit of what is Shorewood. We have no "visible component" within our village that brings all of these together, to express the total of our community spirit.  We have no code or ordinance and no commssion or commission head to give us direction and leadership. "

http://blogs.shorewoodnow.com/from_the_village_square/archive/2008/01/28/spirit-of-shorewood.aspx

In summation, I urge the Shorewood School Board to step back, reconsider, and look at our school system from a "sum zero" perspective.  Don't "neutron" the system, saving the buildings at the sake of the students and teachers. 

If it costs more money --- so be it --- as long as the investment is the result of a unified plan, with the Village, in making our schools the best they can be - now and for the future - and maintaining our school system as one of the major factors in making Shorewood a place people want to live.

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ?  PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.

 For some thoughts on issues other than Shorewood, visit my other blog at

http://nonconventionalwisdomperspectives.blogspot.com/


 

Shorewood Officials Rolling the Dice With Our Tax Money According to TMJ4 TV

By David Tatarowicz
Friday, Feb 1 2008, 09:57 AM

  

  You Paid for It: A Shining Shorewood

The "Teaser" for a Feature segment by Aaron Diamant on Channel 4 last night (TMJ) was that Taxpayers were Paying to Replace Streetlights that Weren't Broken --- it was a story about all the money that the Shorewood Village Board is spending in what the story called a "Bet" that may or may not pay off.  (You can see the story at http://www.todaystmj4.com/features/iteam/15042406.html )
 
Excerpts From the Story:
 
"Economic redevelopment is sort of like a trip to Vegas. You have to bet big to win big. The Village of Shorewood put up big bucks to beef up it's business district. Village leaders are banking on a big-time return, but if things don't go as planned, you'll pay for it.

Earlier this month dozens of Shorewood's residents packed a village meeting hall for a progress report on the $19.5 million plan to shore up the aging business district.

The focus: Oakland Avenue and Capitol Drive. Better streets and sidewalks, new lighting and landscaping, facelifts for old buildings and plans for more new buildings with storefronts and high-end condos.

To get things rolling, Shorewood borrowed nearly $3.5 million through bond sales. Revenue from those bonds bought the first round of street-side improvements, and created a huge pile of cash that the village offers to developers as incentives to build.

However, village leaders aren't advertising the fact that if the redevelopment doesn't happen as fast enough, taxpayers would be on the hook to pay back those bonds.

"It's a fluid plan," admitted board president Guy Johnson. "we know that things are going to change, but if you don't have a plan that you're starting with, you're just going to let randomness take over, too, and that's what we're trying to avoid."

Despite the risk, if all this does work out, some projections show Shorewood's business district could be worth $100 million to $400 million more than it is today in just 14 years."
 
MY QUESTION IS WHERE IN THE WORLD DID THE VILLAGE GET THE PROJECTION OF AN INCREASED VALUE OF $100 TO $400 MILLION DUE TO THESE EXPENDITURES ?
 
PRESUMABLY THERE WILL BE SOME INCREASE IN VALUE, EVEN WITH THE STATUS QUO --- SO HOW WILL THE DIFFERENCE IN THAT INCREASE BE MADE FROM THE INCREASE DUE TO THE PLANNED EXPENDITURES ?
 
JUST HOW RELIABLE CAN A FORECAST OF INCREASED VALUE BE WHEN IT RANGES FROM $100 TO $400 MILLION ---- COMMON SENSE WOULD SEEM TO SAY THAT IF THE ESTIMATE COULD BE $300 MILLION LOW --- COULDN'T IT ALSO BE $300 MILLION HIGH FOR A LOSS OF $200 MILLION ?
 
WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ?  PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.
 
 
 

 For some thoughts on issues other than Shorewood, visit my other blog at

http://nonconventionalwisdomperspectives.blogspot.com/



 
 
 

 

Capitol Drive Merchants in Shorewood Get 2nd Class Treatment

By David Tatarowicz
Thursday, Dec 20 2007, 03:05 PM

Two nights ago, on the 18th, the Shorewood DPW committed a large crew during the night to do a snow removal operation in the Business District.

Hooray !!!!!

On my block (4400 N Oakland)  and south, they did a great job.  Shoppers can actually get from their cars to the shops now.  

However -- (you knew there was going to be a however) -- the Merchants on Capitol Drive have nothing to cheer about.  As of this afternoon, their stores and the street are still separated by mounds of ice and snow.  

I wonder if anyone on the Shorewood Board of Trustees has ever had any retail experience (other than shopping).  If they ever depended upon retail sales for their livelihood, they would know that this week -- the week before Christmas -- can be a make or break event for many of the merchants.

With the high rate of property taxes that are paid for commercial property in Shorewood --- in addition to the BID tax that commercial property owners pay --- it is outrageous that these merchants are not taken better care of by the Village.

Note to Village Trustees:  Forget about bicycle races, and forget about artist displays by outside vendors at the high school, and forget about spending Tens of Thousands of Dollars Advertising how Friendly Shorewood is to Pedestrians and how Upscale the stores are for Shoppers --- try spending the money on clearing the snow banks so the merchants can make a little money and keep their businesses open.


 
More Posts

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs