WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


Waste Management -- a Shorewood Vendor --Screws 38 Teamsters out of Jobs

By David Tatarowicz
Friday, Oct 3 2008, 09:55 AM

 When you see a Waste Management truck in Shorewood, chances are that it is a scab driver who was hired by Wasted Management as a Permanent Replacement Worker during the recent Teamster strike.  Thirty Eight of the Teamster Drivers were shafted by WM.

Waste Management decided the time was right this year to beat down the Teamsters on benefits they had negotiated over the years.  In today's economy Waste Management did not have too much trouble finding drivers who would work for less than the Union Drivers.

Since Ronald Reagan set example of how to break a union (air traffic controllers) private industry has followed his example in questionable negotiating tactics ever since --- and with the blessing of Federal Regulators who are suppose to assure that Union Workers' Rights are not violated.

Must be the same Federal Regulators watching over the Financial and Securities Industries that now need a $700 Billion Bailout !!

I have heard (to be confirmed) that Waste Management has a 10 year contract with Shorewood. 

I wonder if Shorewood gets a discount for the lower costs Waste Management now has ?  

I wonder how Shorewoodians like the idea of a Union Busting Company as one of our Vendors ?

WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME !


CAN I GET AN AMENT FOR BROTHER WALKER ? 

Read all about it on my Google Blog at   

http://nonconventionalwisdomperspectives.blogspot.com/

Comments

David Casper   

I'm not entirely sure how these folks were "screwed" or "shafted."  They walked off the job.  If I didn't like something my employer was doing and simply refused to work in protest, I'm can't see why I should have any reasonable expectation that my job would be waiting for me when I finally decide to return.

Striking comes with risks.  Sometimes the result is good, sometimes it's bad.  But when folks decide to strike, they'd better be good and ready to accept the same facts all employees do:  you don't do the job, don't expect to have one.

October 3, 2008 11:43 AM

Jaime   

Those WM workers were attempting to secure their retirements, both for themselves and previous retirees. It was far more than they "just didn't like something" their employer was doing "and simply refused to work in protest".

This wasn't any 'gimmie gimmie gimmie MORE' action, it was an attempt to not lose what had already been promised to them already by their employer.

October 7, 2008 10:09 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs