WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


IS BIG BLOCK UGLY DEVELOPMENT THE FUTURE FOR SHOREWOOD'S RIVERFRONT ?

By David Tatarowicz
Monday, Dec 17 2007, 01:13 PM
DEAR READERS
 
I RECEIVED A COPY OF THIS LETTER ADDRESSED TO ALL OF SHOREWOOD AND FIND THE CONTENT INTERESTING .......... AFTER YOU READ IT, PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS.  
 
THANKS DAVE 
 
Dear Shorewood friends,
 
Some of you may have heard about a proposal to tear down the Riverbrook Restaurant and the Sherburn place apartments (where I live) to put in a senior living center.
 
As a resident of the apartments and a professional in the field of research and environmental education,  I find SO MANY problems with the development from just about every angle.
 
 1) The developers are not considering any green design.  They are tearing down perfectly good buildings and bringing in all new materials.
 
2) The developer  when asked about green building showed no interest and gave misinformation to the zoning committee. Specifically, she said LEED Certification, (the recognized standard for measuring building sustainability) meant nothing more than slapping a green roof on the building. 
 
3) Green design is not only environmentally friendly, but it is functional and considers the use of the building and the residents that live there. 
 
 4 ) The developer is advertising river views from the upper floors but assured me through some magic of landscaping that you won't see the building from the river
 
 5 ) It's a HUGE 4-story, cookie-cutter box  building from a national chain of senior living centers in which the owners are facing lawsuits for fraud and neglect  (Sunrise Senior Living) .   This is so against what I feel are the strengths of Shorewood - walkable neighborhoods with locally owned businesses.  If senior living is truly needed, it would be easier to swallow this change if this were the future of sustainable design in senior living, designed by Kubala-Washatko, something Shorewood could be proud of.  This is a valuable piece of real estate, and the change they create will be around for a long time.  (And I think the building is hideous)
 
6) We will lose one of the only pockets of diversity in Shorewood where there is relatively affordable living (Sherburn Apartments) and sit-down dining (Riverbrook).  I ate brunch at the Riverbrook on Saturday and was floored by how packed the place was and by the degree of diversity I observed.
 
7) There are currently 50 people at Sherburn apartments, including families, some elderly, and people that have lived there almost thirty years.  At any time these people could get 30 days notice to leave according to the owner who has had terrible communication (virtually none) with the residents or even the building manager. 
 
The truth is, for me this will be an inconvenience - I've moved around a lot.  For others this will be a life upheaval.
 
The project is still in its preliminary stages, but if nothing is done, it will undoubtedly move forward.  I urge anyone that is available to come to the two meetings this week at the Shorewood Village Hall, located on Murray Avenue, 1/2 block south of Capitol, between the Police/Fire Department building and the Shorewood Public Library.  The meetings will be in the courtroom on the second floor unless there is a large turnout, in which case the meeting will be moved to the basement of the library.  (A large turnout would be nice)
 
Meeting times are:
Monday, December 17th, at 7:30pm
Tuesday, December 18th, at 7:00pm
 
Monday's meeting (tonight) will be a presentation of the proposed development by the developer to the Shorewood Village Board.
Tuesday's meeting will be the Zoning and Planning Committee.  They will be discussing this and other projects under consideration by the Village.
 
Please forward this to friends or anyone else who you feel may have an interest in this project.  These are elected officials making this decision and it's up to us to make sure they represent their constituents over an outside developer.
 
Thank you for your support!
 
Tim Vargo
 

Comments

Ann23   

I can see the pros and cons of this proposal.  On one hand, it is sad to see a local restaurant and affordable housing building go and I wish they would consider environmentally friendly design.  On the other hand, Shorewood really needs to get bullish on redevelopment in order to boost the tax base.  Our tax rate was the second highest in the metro area and will probably be the No. 1 highest in the near future since West Milwaukee is going gangbusters with redevelopment projects.  I also do not think a large 4-story building is out of character for Shorewood, which is the densest municipality in Wisconsin.  Finally, without having detailed information on Sunrise Senior Living, it is quite possible some of the residents of Sherburn Apartments will be able to live affordably in the new development when it is completed.

December 18, 2007 8:23 AM

Cheryl Gordon Glicker   

I am a 1970 graduate of Shorewood High School.  I lived in Shorewood from the time I was 3 months old until I left to get married at age 21.  My Mother and my Brother and his family live in the area still.  I return periodically to visit (and I have missed only one class reunion in 37 years).  Although I currently make my home Northwest of Detroit, Shorewood is still "home" to me.  In recent years, classmates of mine have bemoaned to me the fact that they can no longer afford to live in Shorewood because of the taxes.  These are people whose parents grew up here, who have raised their children here, who hoped that their grandchildren would be able to attend Shorewood High School!  Why, why, why would anyone consider turning this unique and wonderful village into a cookie-cutter, carbon copy of most of American suburbia just because there is money to be made from aging baby-boomers (me and my contemporaries) who represent the biggest money-making opportunity of the 21st century?  I'll tell you why -- because all they can see are the $$$$ signs.  They don't care about ambience, they don't care about river views, they don't care about "community" where each individual cares about the other individuals who live around him/her.  If you want to turn your village over to people who just don't care about it -- then you will get exactly what you deserve -- no one who cares about anyone!

If you need to put in senior housing, fine -- do so.  But at least try to make it as environmentally friendly and ecologically non-invasive as humanly possible!  I was actually considering moving back to the area after I retire next year.  I may be reconsidering.  Village Board Members: Think long and hard and get absolutely all the information you can from every possible resource before you do what you must do.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Gordon Glicker, Milford, Michigan

December 18, 2007 10:39 AM

Nancy Peske   

Sunrise Assisted Living centers is traded on the NY stock exchange; they have 450 centers, and if you do a quick Google search, you'll find some pretty horrific stories about the care at these centers. According to their representative who attended last night's Village Board meeting, the price for a tiny, single, private room with no kitchen, just a minimal kitchenette,  would be $3900 a month. Compare these prices with the currently available rooms at local assisted living centers and the number of vacancies in the area and you'll see we really don't need more high end assisted living facilities. What we do need are Family Care beds--assisted living spaces that are subsidized by the state. These beds are rare because the profit is in private pay. Do you really think this company would be trading on the NYSE if they were truly concerned with providing affordable assisted living for fragile seniors? And how can Sunrise possibly justify their horrific record of care? Do they represent our values?

If Shorewood yearns for diversity and for young families, why would we want to destroy an affordable housing unit that offers both and replace it with a Walmartesque assisted living facility when there are already pricey assisted living spaces available nearby?

Yes, we need to increase our tax base-but a restaurant and a residential building DO pay taxes! And we need to bring in MORE diversity and MORE kids who will attend our public school, not drive them out!

December 18, 2007 1:54 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs