WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


Light Rail --- A Shot of Vitality for Shorewood and the Northshore

By David Tatarowicz
Monday, Oct 15 2007, 07:44 PM

In today's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, was a proposed Light Rail plan by Michael  Cudahy. 

I won't repeat his reasoning for Light Rail here.  If you are interested and don't have today's paper, you can look it up online at http://www.jsonline.com/

The initial line he proposes, in part, comes from downtown up Farwell and Prospect (one way on each), joining up on Oakland Avenue, to terminate at the Shorewood / Milwaukee boundary line.

Now let's imagine that the line would continue up Oakland Avenue, through Shorewood to Hampton, then west Santa Monica, north to Silver Spring, and then west on Silver Spring to Bayshore.

Since we are going to tear up Oakland Avenue anyway, wouldn't this be the ideal time to explore the Light Rail option ?

If the plan goes ahead as Michael Cudahy proposes, and the heavy infrastructure costs are covered by the Federal Money that he has identified, perhaps Shorewood can participate at not much more of a cost than including the rails in the Oakland Makeover. 

I would be willing to bet that  Mr. Cudahy and Mayor Barrett, would be very interested in working with Shorewood --- and perhaps our neighbors in Whitefish Bay and Glendale.

For Whitefish Bay and Shorewood, Light Rail would help their shopping districts compete with Bayshore ---  even as folks  ride the rail to Bayshore, they will have the opportunity to shop Shorewood and Bay's more boutique offerings along the way. 

For Glendale, it would make Bayshore a more viable destination for shoppers from the East Side and Downtown.

If we are serious about increasing Shorewood's residential appeal, and building up our retail markets, I believe Light Rail will do much more than our current plans for new street lights and garbage cans along Oakland and Capitol ---- or  artificial turf  and a second dome at the high school.

 

 

 

 

Comments

Joe Mangiamele    

Dave, I agree with you on the idea of light rail being revived by Cudahy. I've been pushing for fast transit from Downtown Milwaukee to Mitchell Field, then to O”Hare and then to the Loop and back again since 1963 when I arrived in Milwaukee. That and light rail would really make us a going metropolis.

Joe

 Dear Joe

 It is ironic that in the Milwaukee area we are (and have been) discussing Regional Planning and transportation --- and in reality, as you correctly point out, we are really part of a much larger "economic zone" that probably should be considered as running from Gary, IN on the south to at least Port Washington, on the north.  Too bad the implementation of the kind of rail you are talking about, is at least 44 years past due --- imagine the economic growth and prosperity such transporation opportunities would have created.

It would appear that the reluctance to have any kind of "rail" in the Milwaukee Metro area is a carryover of the White Flight to Waukesha and other collar counties over the past few decades. 

One of the biggest detractors of "rail" of course is Scott Walker, who, it seems to me, caters more to the interests of Waukesha County and the like --- as his aspirations are to run for Gorvernor, and that is the constituency with which he shares the same values.

 Dave  

October 20, 2007 11:49 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs