WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Senior Viewpoint

Dick Steinberg has resided in the city of Brookfield for 35 years. He served 34 years as municipal judge and has been an attorney for 50 years. He enjoys tennis, golf, biking and creative writing, which includes legal issues, sports, government and people.

He'd love to hear from you. Click here to send him an e-mail.

CITY OF BROOKFIELD 2008 BUDGET

By Richard J. Steinberg
Saturday, Oct 11 2008, 03:10 PM

It is budget time again the city department heads have been busy formulating their 2008 budget requests, having meetings with city leaders and preparing to make their presentations to the Finance Committee.

The proposed budget has been published for public consumption and it is a voluminous document which will take time for me to review.

With the staggering financial disaster we all have a duty in our community to watch carefully as our elected officials and city employees decide how to allocate our tax dollars.

During my 34 years as Municipal Judge I presented 34 budgets and that experience gives me an insight into city finances.

The numbers to look out for are the line items, not always published, which constitute the small expenses that grow into the final numbers that are published.

Some of these small expenses are office furniture and accessories, expense allowances, replacement equipment, paper, use of utilities, newsletters, medical insurance for employees, and yes even pens and coffee cups with the city logo.

The Journal/Sentinel recently reported that the Mayor is calling for a 4.29% general fund spending increase, and that trying to chop that increase back to 2.8% would mean finding about $520,000 in spending reductions which the Mayor said would reduce the city's high quality services.

The ball is in the Mayor's court to find that money, reduce the budget and maybe, just maybe, recommend a property tax reduction that city residents can live with during these difficult times.

So, let's all do our part to help our city save money.

 

Comments

Richard J. Steinberg   

Today I have communicated to common council members the accurate information on DARE program funding by the municipal court during my tenure. DARE is a great program and does not have to be cut.

Also, it is impossible to cut expenses without knowing the line items from each department.

An idea is to consider cutting garbage service to every 2 weeks during the winter.

October 13, 2008 11:45 AM

Tom Gehl   

Thanks, Judge.

No right thinking person would question the tremendous inentions or objectives of DARE.  But I worry about such programs that have no objetively established measure of success.  By what criteria do we deem them to be "great".  

October 14, 2008 1:13 PM

Richard J. Steinberg   

Tom. Thanks for you comments. Please read my discussions with Alderman Scott Berg on this website. DARE is the only program we have to combat drug and alcohol abuse and respect for law and order , for the youth of our community. The cost is minimal compared to other educational ventures. The opponents of DARE are either jealous of its success or in favor of legalized drug use. My concern is for the children and to never, never, stop trying to save their lives.

October 14, 2008 10:48 PM

mikeyd   

HI Judge Steinberg and Tom,

I agree with the Judge on this one for certain. Tom present's his case as requiring some type of measure for success.  It is very difficult to measure success of a program such as DARE in a completely objective numerical sense. In a time when drugs are more available, more varied, and being used by younger and younger people, the best we could hope for is to have no more drug arrests in the schools than we had 10-20 years ago. The fact that we don't have an epidemic in our high schools seems to indicate we are on the right track. It is just very difficult to measure this with testing. Don't doubt that a police officer showing up at an elementary school with gun attached would have some affect on students looking on, even if he or she has a very nice and pleasant demeanor. The term 'scared straight' comes to mind. One method to attempt to get a measure of it empirically would be to throw a few questions on some larger exam regarding impressions or memory of the presentation to students two years later and see if they remember it, and if they do remember, that in itself would indicate it had an impression.

I remember in grade school when an officer showed up to give some educational talk, and it always impressed me. I still specifically remember seeing him standing there and which room it was, and that he was really nice and friendly and smiling, and I did Not want to run into him in another situation. That may not have been the DARE program specifically, but That was a few decades ago so it is safe to say it made a lifelong impression...

If DARE is the program that puts the officers in the schools to meet the students, and develop a relationship whether it be a friendly one or a one-sided somewhat fearful one, it is beneficial and can have lasting effects.

October 16, 2008 9:01 AM

Tom Gehl   

MIKEYD - Good points all.  The benefits may not be measurable, but they may be significant, particularly relative to their cost.

October 16, 2008 12:16 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs