WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » GOVERNMENT » TRAVEL (RSS)

Related Tags

I See London, I See France...

By Janet Evans
Friday, Jun 6 2008, 11:15 AM


Looks like airports are going to be seeing a little more than your underpants, since eventually over 2000 of the nation's airports will be replacing metal detectors with body-scanners that can see through your clothing.  You've probably heard of these scanners before...they can see your body parts very clearly.






"Body-scanning machines that show images of people underneath their clothing are being installed in 10 of the nation's busiest airports in one of the biggest public uses of security devices that reveal intimate body parts.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) recently started using body scans on randomly chosen passengers in Los Angeles, Baltimore, Denver, Albuquerque and at New York's Kennedy airport.

Airports in Dallas, Detroit, Las Vegas and Miami will be added this month. Reagan National Airport in Washington starts using a body scanner today. A total of 38 machines will be in use within weeks.

"It's the wave of the future," said James Schear, the TSA security director at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, where two body scanners are in use at one checkpoint.

Schear said the scanners could eventually replace metal detectors at the nation's 2,000 airport checkpoints and the pat-downs done on passengers who need extra screening. "We're just scratching the surface of what we can do with whole-body imaging," Schear said."

Read the full story on USA Today




 

Ahem....Not a Dangerous Weapon

By Janet Evans
Friday, Mar 28 2008, 11:45 AM


It’s just a fact since 9-11…

And everyone who travels by air should know it by now.

The rules are more strict.

Some metal detectors are set higher than others.

You must remove your jewelry before passing through metal detectors.

TSA workers are not always consistent.

But here’s a warning for you…especially for women.

If you are planning on traveling by way of Lubbock, TX, and you have nipple rings….

Remove them at home.

Read about what one woman went through in Texas when she was required to remove her nipple rings in order to board a flight, including having to use pliers to do so, on MSNBC

Nipple Rings Cause Airport Security Issue   í here


Oh, boo hoo

You know what?

I don't feel too sorry for Mandi Hamlin.

If she's got some medical reason she can't remove her freak jewelry before she comes to the airport, maybe she can come with a doctor's release.

I know what I can take and what I can't when I go.

Yes, it's strict.

But with the metal left on her body, it could, in a rare case be masking something else that could be hidden on her.

I know that's reaching...but who knows who that one terrorist will be?

And if you are on a plane, do you want TSA to take a chance?

Should they apologize, if that's all she is asking for?

Well, if they were in fact laughing at her, or rude, then yes.

But not for making her remove the jewelry.

And you've got to hand it to Attorney Gloria Allred...she sure can pick the cases.






 


 

International Airports Fingerprinting Upgrade Underway

By Janet Evans
Thursday, Mar 27 2008, 06:30 AM




DHS Begins Collecting 10 Fingerprints from International Visitors at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport

Release Date: March 25, 2008

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
Contact: US-VISIT Public Affairs, 202-298-5200
CBP Public Affairs 212-514-8324

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today that it has begun collecting additional fingerprints from international visitors arriving at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK). The change is part of the department’s upgrade from two- to 10-fingerprint collection to enhance security and facilitate legitimate travel by more accurately and efficiently establishing and verifying visitors’ identities.

“Biometrics have revolutionized our ability to prevent dangerous people from entering the United States since 2004. Our upgrade to 10‑fingerprint collection builds on our success, enabling us to focus more attention on stopping potential security risks,” US‑VISIT Director Robert Mocny said.

For more than four years, U.S. Department of State (DOS) consular officers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have been collecting biometrics—digital fingerprints and a photograph—from all non-U.S. citizens between the ages of 14 and 79, with some exceptions, when they apply for visas or arrive at U.S. ports of entry.

“Quite simply, this change gives our officers a more accurate idea of who is in front of them. For legitimate visitors, the process becomes more efficient and their identities are better protected from theft. For those who may pose a risk, we will have greater insight into who they are,” added Paul Morris, Executive Director of Admissibility and Passenger Programs, Office of Field Operations, CBP.

The department’s US-VISIT program currently checks a visitor’s fingerprints against DHS records of immigration violators and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) records of wanted persons and known or suspected terrorists. Checking biometrics against the watch list helps officers make visa determinations and admissibility decisions. Collecting 10 fingerprints also improves fingerprint matching accuracy and the department’s ability to compare a visitor’s fingerprints against latent fingerprints collected by Department of Defense (DOD) and the FBI from known and unknown terrorists all over the world. Additionally, visitors’ fingerprints are checked against the FBI’s Criminal Master File.

On an average day at JFK, almost 14,400 international visitors complete US‑VISIT biometric procedures. Visitors from Mexico, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France and Japan comprise the largest numbers of international visitors arriving at JFK. 

JFK is the tenth port of entry to begin collecting 10 fingerprints from international visitors. Washington Dulles International Airport began 10-fingerprint collection on
November 29, 2007. Hartsfield‑Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Boston Logan International Airport, Chicago O’Hare International Airport, George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport, San Francisco International Airport, Miami International Airport, Orlando International Airport and Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport have also begun 10-fingerprint collection.

US‑VISIT is evaluating 10‑fingerprint collection at these airports. It will use the results to inform the deployment of the technology to the remaining air, sea and land border ports of entry that will transition to collecting 10 fingerprints by December 2008.

Since US‑VISIT began in 2004, DHS has used biometric identifiers to prevent the use of fraudulent documents, protect visitors from identity theft, and stop thousands of criminals and immigration violators from entering the country. US‑VISIT, in cooperation with CBP, is leading the transition to a 10-fingerprint collection standard. This upgrade is the result of an interagency partnership among DHS, FBI, DOD and DOS.

###

This page was last reviewed/modified on March 25, 2008.


 


 

Airport Security Tailspin?

By Janet Evans
Monday, Jan 7 2008, 06:35 AM


When I lived in Florida, back in the 70's and would go on trips by plane, while sitting in Miami International Airport, or Ft. Lauderdale Airport, the thought and fear of a hijack to Cuba would always be in the back of my mind.  Hijacking seemed quite frequent back then (once in your local airport was enough).

After 9-11 we all accepted the TSA airport security requirements.  While inconveniences, they became a somewhat normal part of travel.  What might have been a 2-4 hour ordeal in travel was now expanded by at least two hours.  

We still keep accepting each new security requirement as it comes along.   We grumble.  But we do our part.  There's a reason for this madness, isn't there?  We can't forget those lives that were lost and sacrificed on 9-11.

I will never forget those lives lost.  But my views on our current security system have changed since I read an article by a commercial airline pilot, Patrick Smith. He says the following:

"In years past, a takeover meant hostage negotiations and standoffs; crews were trained in the concept of “passive resistance.” All of that changed forever the instant American Airlines Flight 11 collided with the north tower. What weapons the 19 men possessed mattered little; the success of their plan relied fundamentally on the element of surprise. And in this respect, their scheme was all but guaranteed not to fail."

"For several reasons — particularly the awareness of passengers and crew — just the opposite is true today. Any hijacker would face a planeload of angry and frightened people ready to fight back. Say what you want of terrorists, they cannot afford to waste time and resources on schemes with a high probability of failure. And thus the September 11th template is all but useless to potential hijackers".

Read Patrick Smith's full article on the NY Times, Jet Lagged

The Airport Security Follies       here


While I have doubted the training and experience of the TSA employees in many airports, I had never really thought good and hard before about the airport security program and its future.  Patrick Smith shows there is nothing but failure on the horizon for the program.

Homeland Security needs to rethink what our priorities are in our airports.

What do you think after reading the article?





 

Gimme 10

By Janet Evans
Monday, Dec 3 2007, 01:15 PM

 



The Department of Homeland Security plans to replace the current two-fingerprint scanners with new 10‑fingerprint scanners at all U.S. ports of entry over the next year.

On November 29, 2007, Homeland Security began the initial transition at Washington Dulles International Airport. In early 2008, nine U.S. airports will also collect additional fingerprints from international visitors. They include:

  • Boston Logan International Airport (Boston, Mass.)
  • Chicago O’Hare International Airport (Chicago, Ill.)
  • Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (Detroit, Mich.)
  • Hartsfield‑Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Atlanta, Ga.)
  • George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport (Houston, Texas)
  • Miami International Airport (Miami, Fla.)
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (New York, N.Y.)
  • Orlando International Airport (Orlando, Fla.)
  • San Francisco International Airport. (San Francisco, Calif.)

The Department of State currently uses 10‑fingerprint scanners at most of its visa‑issuing posts and will complete deployment worldwide by the end of 2007.

The transition from collecting two digital fingerprints to collecting 10 fingerprints from international visitors is one of the department’s top priorities because it furthers the department's ability to keep dangerous people out of the United States, while making legitimate travel more efficient.

______________________________


I think this is a great idea! 


I’m sure there will be much outrage about this from international travelers. 

But again, so what? 

U.S. travelers go through all types of hassles entering and leaving other countries. 

Let them be “unglued.”

Let’s hope the systems are tested and the officials manning them are proficient in how to use them. 

Is that too much to ask?


Your thoughts?



 


 

Unwelcoming or Viligant?

By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Nov 20 2007, 06:00 AM

 

America the Unwelcoming 
   


Dr. Fareed Zakaria, an immigrant, and Editor of Newsweek International, accuses the United States of being UNWELCOMING to foreign travelers.  We're the ONLY country that is so hard on those that want to enter, even just for business purposes. 


He says: 

"Every American who has a friend abroad has heard some story about the absurd hassle and humiliation of entering or exiting the United States. But these pale in comparison to the experience of foreigners who commit minor infractions. A tourist from New Zealand, Rick Giles, mistakenly overstayed his visa in America by a few days and found himself summarily arrested for six weeks earlier this fall. Treaty obligations say his country's embassy should have been informed of the arrest, but it wasn't. A German visitor, Valeria Vinnikova, overstayed her visa by a couple of days and tried to remedy the situation—so that she could spend more time with her fianc[e], the Dartmouth College squash coach. Instead she was handcuffed and had her feet shackled, then was carted off to be imprisoned. She now faces deportation and a 10-year ban on entering the United States. (Thanks to AndrewSullivan .com for drawing attention to these.)"
____________________________

Extreme cases ....  perhaps? 

If not, so what?  Why shouldn't we be suspect of each and every foreign visitor who enters our country if they commit an infraction, even if it is MINOR? 

Why must we always make exceptions for those who can't conform to OUR laws? 

Why are we ALWAYS the bad guys?

Read America the Unwelcoming and make your own decision. 

This is a huge BUMP for me. 

This is my country.  I'm inconvenienced in many ways since 9-11, especially at airports, all government buildings, schools and more.  Don't whine to me because you, a foreigner, have to be inconvenienced because you have a MINOR INFRACTION when I have committed none and am willing to make concessions daily in order to keep my fellow American citizens safe!

Yes, I AM UNGLUED.  Every American should be, as well.

So Thursday I will give thanks that I live in America

I will give thanks for the fact that I am FREE

I thank god for the day my grandfather traveled here from Latvia by himself, not speaking a word of English, got off a ship with just a tag around his neck, with his name on it. 

A "peasant" is what he was classified on his passport. 

He came here LEGALLY. 

He followed the SYSTEM. 

He LEARNED the LANGUAGE. 

He became a CITIZEN

He WORKED hard. 

He was proud to be an AMERICAN.

I am proud to be an American!


 


 

The Scoop on Passports

By Janet Evans
Monday, Nov 12 2007, 12:05 AM


NEW PASSPORT LAWS IN THE US



Last year when a new travel law enforcing everyone going out of the country present their passport, there was a clamor amongst most travelers.  The announcement was abrupt and the agency that issues passports were on a backlog.  That seemed to be unfair since for years US travelers only needed to show their identification to be able to go through and visit Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean.  Because of the inconveniences, the law was temporarily suspended.  But those that are allowed to travel without a passport still have to show proof that they applied for a passport.


Now the backlog has been cleared and the law is slowly being enforced. Currently, anyone who travels by air to these mentioned countries and territories have to show their passports. This will be required for travel from now on. You can’t say to the people in the airlines that you’re waiting for the passport to come and all you have is a receipt.

The US government was able to produce 12 million passports last year to answer the backlog. When the backlog of passports started, it used to be more than two months before you could actually receive the passport. The usual turnaround time for passport requests is now in six weeks which is the standard procedure.

If you’re not traveling by air, you can still show the customary papers to go through the border. It could be a government issued ID such as drivers license or marriage certificate. For kids, they will be required to show their birth certificate to be allowed to cross the borders of the country. But you have to show that you applied for passport.

The exception of land and water based travel will not stay long. In January 2008, anyone who crosses the border should show their passports. Even when you’re traveling by land, air or water, you do not only show a valid ID but you have to show your passport at the same time. Passport is also required if you want to go back to the country. That includes the kids and the infants.

Another temporary exception will be those that will travel before the end of the year and will go back on January 2008. Since a passport is not required to pass through the borders before 2008, you can go back without any passport required.

So if you’re planning to go to these places sometime next year, better apply for a passport now. If it’s your first time to apply for a passport, you have to do it in person. There are more than 9,000 centers that you can apply personally around the country. A personal appearance is also required if you’re passport has been expired for more than 15 years. For passport renewals, you can go online and download the form. Send the form with two passport-worthy photos and $67.00 renewal fee.

If you want your processing expedited, add $60.00 for rush processing but standard processing is only six to eight weeks. Give yourself at least two months before you can actually go out of the country from now on.

Have you gotten your PASSPORT yet?

Don’t wait until it’s too late!

Where to apply for a passport in our area:

Facility Name Street Address City State ZIP Code Public Phone Distance
Hales Corners Post Office 5444 S. 108th St. Hales Corners WI 53130-9998 (414) 425-2094     4.3
Airport Facility 5500 S. Howell Avenue Milwaukee WI 53237-9741 (414) 481-0258     6.5
New Berlin 15300 W. Howard Av. New Berlin WI 53151 (262) 797-2431     7.5
South Milwauke Post Office 2210 Tenth Avenue South Milwaukee WI 53172-9998 (800) 275-8777     7.7
Milwaukee WI County Clerk 901 N. Ninth Street Milwaukee WI 53233 (414) 278-4067    11.2

Juneau Station Post Office, Milw. WI

606 East Juneau Avenue Milwaukee WI 53202-9998 (414) 289-0784    12.4
Racine 4-Mile Station Post Office 2635 4-Mile Road Racine WI 53404-9998 (262) 681-7866    13.2
Sturtevant, WI Post Office 2849 Wisconsin Street Sturtevant WI 53177-9998 (262) 886-4104    13.3
Waukesha Main Post Office 300 East Broadway Waukesha WI 53186-9998 (262) 650-5388    13.4
Brookfield Main Post Office 17345 Civic Drive Brookfield WI 53045 (262) 782-0588    14.7

 
How to Apply in Person for a Passport   ←  click here for full information

 
Should You Apply In Person?

You are applying for a U.S. passport for the first time . . . Yes

Your previous U.S. passport was lost, stolen, or damaged . . .Yes

Your previous U.S. passport has expired & was issued more that 15 years ago … Yes

Your previous passport has expired and it was issued when you were under 16 …Yes

Your name has changed since your passport was issued and you do not have a legal document
 formally changing your name … Yes

NOTE: All persons must have their own passports, including infants.  If you are behind in child support payments, you may not be able to get a passport. 

 

Passport Fees

March 8, 2005

Routine Services (Form DS-11)
Non-Refundable

Age 16 and older: The passport application fee is $67. The execution fee is $30. The total is $97 .

Under Age 16: The passport application fee is $52. The execution fee is $30. The total is $82 .

The passport application fee includes the $12.00 Security Surcharge, which became effective March 8, 2005.


 

How Long Will it Take to Process a Passport Application?

At this time, we are processing routine applications within four to six weeks of receipt.  We are processing requests for expedited service within three weeks. If you are traveling or need your passport in order to get a visa within the next 2 weeks:Please call us at the National Passport Information Center at 1-877-4USA-PPT (1-877-487-2778) to schedule an appointment to apply in person at a Passport Agency (please see note below). If you have already applied but will not need your passport within the next two weeks:There should be no need to contact us at this time. Our goal is to make sure that no one misses a trip. We have added staff and are working overtime across the country to achieve this goal.  


For more information see  Passport Application Processing Times.

The Passport Services Office provides information and services to American citizens about how to obtain, replace or change a passport.

A passport is an internationally recognized travel document that verifies the identity and nationality of the bearer. A valid U.S. passport is required to enter and leave most foreign countries. Only the U.S. Department of State has the authority to grant, issue or verify United States passports.

New Application for a U.S. Passport

To obtain a passport for the first time, you need to go in person to one of over 9,000 passport acceptance facilities located throughout the United States with two photographs of yourself, proof of U.S. citizenship, and a valid form of photo identification such as a driver’s license.

Acceptance facilities include many Federal, state and probate courts, post offices, some public libraries and a number of county and municipal offices. There are also 13 regional passport agencies, and 1 Gateway City Agency, which serve customers who are traveling within 2 weeks (14 days), or who need foreign visas for travel. Appointments are required in such cases.

You’ll need to apply in person if you are applying for a U.S. passport for the first time:  if your expired U.S. passport is not in your possession; if your previous U.S. passport has expired and was issued more than 15 years ago; if your previous U.S. passport was issued when you were under age 16; or if your currently valid U.S. passport has been lost or stolen.

For more information on getting a new passport, please visit How to get a passport page.

Renewal of a U.S. Passport

You can renew by mail if: Your most recent passport is available to submit and it is not damaged; you received the passport within the past 15 years; you were over age 16 when it was issued; you still have the same name, or can legally document your name change.

You can get a passport renewal application form by downloading it from this site.

If your passport has been, altered or damaged, you cannot apply by mail. You must apply in person.

For more information on how to renew a passport, please visit How to renew a passport page.
_______________________________________________

Now to why I am “unglued” …

I have no problem and I am ALL FOR everyone traveling over our borders having a passport. 

But if this is now the requirement and it is not just for business or pleasure …
 

PLEASE REDUCE THE PRICE OF A PASSPORT ! ! ! 

There are PLENTY of people who do not travel that would like to have a passport “just in case.”  Who wants to pay $97 “just in case?”

My father lives in Northern Vermont, 20 miles from the border of Canada.  It’s pretty desolate up there and sometimes it is necessary to cross over into Canada to shop. 

The Canadians do the same thing, and visit US doctors.  My dad refuses to pay the $97 just so he can go to an apple orchard (there are none near him – maple syrup yes, apples no).

I think I heard a rumor that “border cities” may issue some type of I.D. instead.  I’m not sure of that.  But that’s not the point.  A passport  that is required should not be used as a profit-making vehicle.

What do you think about Passports being required for ALL travel in 2008? 

How about the cost?
  
 

 
More Posts