WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

From the Village Square


LET"S LET THE SUNLIGHT IN.

By Joe Mangiamele
Thursday, Dec 27 2007, 07:43 AM

In our private affairs most of us want to be private and “not air out our dirty linen in public.”

Government on the other is a public process and needs ultimate airing and transparency. Public linen whether clean or dirty usually takes on a soiled appearance if it's not in the sunlight. Sunlight is in the interest of community.

It has become apparent that in early workings of our local government that what we wanted done at our river's edge in Shorewood,was not considered, because the Board didn't know what was being considered, nor did we the citizens know. 

We must remedy this disability immediately.  We must  stop this project now.  The Board knows that we have taken a wrong turn, we must stop and get new directions.  This proposal is not for us.

We have then two serious questions to consider, what to do with this river oriented land and how to get the public involved in these projects from the early stages?

On the first question, I believe that we must put this land in the positive control of the community and not be in position of waiting for hit and miss proposals.

On the second question, the Village Board must as soon as possible hold a public hearing to deal with the manner in which we will handle these situations in the future, as how to keep the public informed and involved from the early stages of these projects.

We must limit or eliminate behind-the-scene manipulations. Government is a public business. It is not a secret agency; therefore requires plenty of sunlight.

This situation as it has developed summarizes real concerns and my suggestions are constructively intended. This is not going to go away until we attend to it properly. Let's stop and revise the process.

Obviously, if we had a town meeting situation, all of us would be in the know, including the Board members.  Town meeting situations would not allow these silent prelimanry operations, out of sight of the citizens and perhaps unknown to some members of the Board.  I don't believe these concerns are going to go away.   

Comments

Jaime   

Joe,

You've written numerous times re: how the village board seems to be an entity unto itself and isolated from it's constituents; have you received ANY response from ANY trustee to refute that idea or has there been nothing but silence, more or less verifying what you've suggested?!? I know I, for one, was less that excited when I read the news announcing "Here's YOUR new, forthcoming  assisted living facility!" In light of what other bloggers have been uncovering about the company involved in this project, I can't help but wonder how much research went into that decision?

December 27, 2007 1:10 PM

Joe Mangiamele    

Jaime:

I don't know that my views on the evolution of Shorewood or how we can guide that development are more important than those of any citizen.  I have certainly presented my views and ideas many times and I believe them to be well-based or I won't present them.  I haven't heard any member on the Board say that they would take anything that I've said into consideration or that I've presented a good idea at one time or another, except by one member whom I've talked to on the phone and received e-mails from, who indicates “respect (for) my commentary” and believes that other Board members “care”.  The nature of the Board however is not to deal one-on-one but primarily in consensus.  I know that strong views by any citizen tend to create a feeling of disrupting that consensus base or that accepted process.

December 28, 2007 6:28 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs