WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

The Forum


Shorewood gassed by low flying plane

By Steve Koczela
Thursday, May 29 2008, 07:34 AM
Does this seem odd to anyone else? (hat tip, Jim) 

Low-flying plane spraying for gypsy moths
THURSDAY, May 29, 2008, 6:44 a.m.
By Linda Spice

Callers expressing concern about a low-flying plane over Shorewood and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee about 6 a.m. today learned from Milwaukee County Sheriff's dispatchers that the pilot is spraying for gypsy moths in the area.

"There is no cause for alarm," a dispatcher told deputies on the road over the scanner this morning, noting television news reports of what was occurring.

Sheriff's dispatch raised concerns that neither the department nor Milwaukee police were informed of the plane's intentions and found themselves with citizen phone calls questioning what was happening. They received information from TV choppers in the air this morning but were attempting to get more details from airport officials.

The plane this morning is moving further south toward the downtown Milwaukee area, according to the sheriff's office.

Comments

Jaime   

Steve,

As someone who was out on his upper porch at 6AM in a semi-dazed, uncaffeinated state, with digital camera in hand, I must say it would have been a nice gesture to let us residents know what was going on earlier in the week! In this day and age, unfortunately, the mind wanders to more than a few scary scenarios when there is a plane spraying an unknown substance overhead at such an early hour!

Now that the facts are known, death to the gypsy moths; I mean, look what happened to Pinocchio with gypsies, right? :-D

May 29, 2008 6:05 PM

Nancy Peske   

I can't imagine why so little respect is shown for residents. Why weren't we informed of the spraying so that people could choose to take precautions to guard their health? There are people in this town with lung conditions, allergies, and sensitivities to chemicals.

May 30, 2008 7:18 AM

Steve Koczela   

I wonder how such a spraying would be authorized.  Would this be at the county level?  State?

May 30, 2008 7:22 AM

Jaime   

In regard to the health hazards of the spraying, I checked this site:

http://tinyurl.com/mytm3

B.t.k. is not considered toxic for people, animals, birds, fish, and other insects such as bees and ladybugs. Also, it does not harm water supplies. Despite widespread use, B.t.k. has not been shown to cause infections in persons exposed through aerosol spraying either in the general population, children, or people with immune system disorders.

A small number of persons have reported symptoms including skin rash, irritation of the eyes, nose and throat, and hay fever-like symptoms after exposure to B.t.k. It is not known whether exposure to B.t.k. was responsible for the symptoms; however it is possible that these symptoms might be related to allergic reactions or irritation to a component of the pesticide spray.

May 30, 2008 12:17 PM

Nancy Peske   

Call me a cynic, but when a branch of local government uses the passive voice to express that a pesticide is nontoxic, I don't buy it. Furthermore, people with lung problems, sensitivities, and allergies deserve to know when pesticides are going to be dumped on them and their lawns. Yes, if you're going to spray, do it in the early morning or the wee hours, but to not inform citizens is deeply disrespectful.

May 31, 2008 7:44 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Search the Blogs