WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Brookfield Basics

A column about history, culture, policy, and things in between.

PERSON OF THE YEAR?

By Tom Gehl
Sunday, Dec 30 2007, 06:50 AM

Time magazine recently named Vladimir Putin its Person of the Year for 2007.  The self-described "inventor of the Internet" was their choice as Runner-Up.  

A former KGB apparatchik who "made his bones" in the heyday of the Cold War, Putin is personally responsible for the torture and murder of countless innocents.  Propped up and maintained by the rocketing price of Russian oil, he is sadly and inexorably leading his country back to its autocratic past.   

Time could have selected Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who was tragically assassinated last week.  

And so we see 2007 end on a tragic note.  Pakistan and the world have lost a stunningly courageous and charismatic leader, and what happens in the wake of her death will MATTER here at home.  Bhutto was remarkable on so many levels.  That a woman could emerge as a prominent and respected leader of a Muslim country is in itself remarkable.  That this woman used her position to uphold the ideals of democracy, and preach the need for moderate Islam to establish and cultivate ties with the West, is the stuff that changes the tide of world geo-political events.  And that of course is why the terrorists killed her.  

She claimed last summer that, "I did not choose this life - it chose me".  In addition to Prime Minister, Bhutto was a wife and mother who "counted the cost" as she led.  For most of us, counting the cost is measured in small ways.  For Benazir Bhutto, it meant knowingly living and working with a bounty on her head.

If you seek a definition of courage and leadership in these troubled times, you need look no farther than her life.  For months she knew she was a marked and hunted woman, yet she continued to face the guns of the cowards who could not match her indomitable will or quiet dignity.

Her political career was not the naive choice of someone who thought she could be kept safe.  It was the moral decision of a woman who understood that the call of duty was something greater than her personal desires.  To a world needing leaders of stature and steel, her loss is immeasurable. 

So today - instead of her noble profile and gentle beauty on that cover of Time, we see Putin's dour and sardonic visage squinting down at us; the very picture of a modern-day Dorian Gray. 

What a heroic figure she was. 

What a pathetic choice Time made. 

Comments

Shawn Matson   

I don't agree.  I think everything you said was true...but person of the year isn't a popularity or "goodness" contest.  It's about who had a huge role in the world this year.

December 30, 2007 12:24 PM

Larry Knetzger   

Hi Tom, now what a sour note to her sacrifice to see her son symbolically appointed the leader of her party with her crooked husband behind the son telling the son , now don't get caught skimming like I did. Do you think he learned anything in prison during those eight years. To see over 40 people killed and the country torn apart because of her death shows you the total instability of the country. Not good at all. It is almost that she had a death wish to come back to such a hell hole with the all mighty bomb in some ones pocket also in the back round. No wonder Al-quida wants to kill off democracy. The whole country stinks out loud. Just my humble opinion of course based upon what we read in the news , and how much of that can we believe?. History does repeat itself often.

December 30, 2007 3:54 PM

Tom Gehl   

Happy New Year to you both.

Shawn - I understand the criteria used for Time's annual selection, and it is BECAUSE of her role that I would choose Bhutto over Putin.  The fact that she was a person of character and courage makes her an EASIER choice, not necessarily the CORRECT choice.  

Larry - Yes, Pakistan is a troubled nation, and it has nukes.  That is why her role was so vitally important.  All world leaders tend to think of themselves as "indispenable".  She was one of the few who actually were.

December 31, 2007 8:15 AM

BrkfldDad   

While the West has lost a great ally in Bhutto, I have to agree with Shawn on this one - the nod goes to Putin.  It's very easy to get lost in the emotion of the moment (which we do have to recall is post-Person of the Year selection) and forget the downside of Prime Minister Bhutto.  While her death is a shameful crime and leaves Pakistan in a precarious position, PM Bhutto was no 'saint' herself.  Corrupt and divisive, I often wonder if she really cared about Pakistan, or was just on a lifelong power trip.  Her judgement was questionable as well, just look at the support and help she provided to the Taliban (although the same can be said of previous US Administrations).   Frankly, I find her character and courage to be no better than that of Putin.  And to be honest, I really would have preferred that neither was chosen Person of the Year.  And, given TIME's "rules" for selection, I would think that Ahmadinejad would have been a more logical choice than Putin in TIME's eyes.

December 31, 2007 8:26 PM

BrkfldDad   

Interesting LATimes commentary from Bhutto's niece...

www.latimes.com/.../la-oe-bhutto14nov14,0,5254789.story

January 1, 2008 9:18 PM

Tom Gehl   

BRKFLDDAD - Thanks for the link and for the comments.  Bhutto certainly had some significant "cons" to go along with her "pros". But when one considers a woman rising to that level, against all the tremendous odds of that social/political/spiritual environment, I can't help but consider her a remarkable figure.  

January 2, 2008 4:23 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Search the Blogs