WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Blogage

Ted Klumb is a Commercial Real Estate Broker residing in Menomonee Falls. He is a graduate of UWM and ran his own business for 15 years. He is married with two children. Ted is also a former member of the Menomonee Falls School Board, a faith development music teacher, and an avid, but not a very good, musician.

Enrollment Problem? What Problem?

By Ted Klumb
Wednesday, Nov 14 2007, 10:01 PM

 

Are we talking about the same enrollment problem that has been known for years and is the constant talk of almost every school district around the state, and most of the country with the exception of places like Naples, FL and Las Vegas, NV who are experiencing a huge boom in population?

 

Is enrollment down in the Menomonee Falls School District’? Yes.

 

Are declining enrolments a direct result of nationwide and local demographics? Yes.

 

Are we loosing some students to other districts? Yes. Other districts are loosing students to us as well.

 

Are they leaving because of our School Districts performance? Yes, some, but all School Districts have dissatisfied parents who for one reason or another move their kids. Believe it or not, some even move their kids over athletics. Our exodus of resident students dropped this year by about 50% if I recall correctly.* I hope that is because we are improving in some people's mind. Primarily, we are loosing students to home schooling, an excellent parochial school system (Lutheran and Catholic), virtual schools – in a word competition. *I have ammended my struck out statement, which was way off to 3%. Mrs. Taubenheim was correct in pointing this out and I am sorry for taking too long to point this out. I will provide the correct answer in the comments below.

 

Are we filling the gaps by adding more Chapter 220 and open enrollment students? No.

 

Last year your School Board passed a policy that capped all nonresident enrollment to 10% or less. Last month we voted that nonresident enrollment would be set at about 9.7%. Dr. Marty suggested that we continue to accept Chapter 220 students on a limited basis to send a message that we will support this program. After much research and thought, I absolutely support that decision, as does every board member. So we added 5 students and our overall nonresident population is still under 10%.

 

Will 4-K help with declining enrollment? Yes, of course. See the Brookfield 4-K debate here: http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=686040

 

What can we do to address the statewide enrollment problem? In my opinion, we need to improve our “customer retention” abilities. That is, we need to work harder to keep current resident students and parents dedicated to stay and grow the school district. (More on this at another time.) The Superintendent in Wauwatosa put a plan together to do just that. We also need to make the district more competitive against educational alternatives. Parents have many good choices these days. They can change their child's educational venue as easily as changing banks. When schools compete, parents and students win.

 

Comments

Karen Taubenheim   

"Our exodus of resident students dropped this year by about 50% if I recall correctly."

Can you explian that number? According to Jeff Gross the membership loss for the previous year was 0.  This year it ws 142 or 12 after you factor in the new K4 students.

Also, the district projected to lose only 37, but lost 142.  Are those projections accurate?  Should they be re-evaluated for accuracy?

November 15, 2007 8:27 AM

Andy Mohrfeld   

The enrollment decrease in MF was 3 or 4 times greater than what the district was projecting.  I've never seen any discussion of enrollment decreases of that magnitude and it certainly wasn't mentioned when 4-K was proposed.  I think this is potentially a new problem if such decreases continue.  

November 15, 2007 12:44 PM

Ted Klumb   

Andy:

You are correct about the projected decrease but forcasting students in any district is an inexact science until we get actual numbers in our "Fourth Friday" count taken in week 3 of September 2007.  

There was no discussion regarding 4-K and the 2007-2008 projection other than projecting state aid and taxes. We know decreases are possible or likely. When we got the actual numbers we immediately lowered the tax levy and are making adjustments.

You are also correct about decreases continuing but this is a statewide issue and not a very new problem.

The only solution, as I see it, would be to get more jobs to move into this state and especially into this community. Spitzer didn't help by detonating a neutron bomb at the Strong compound... Our numbers were off that year too.

November 15, 2007 1:32 PM

Andy Mohrfeld   

My problem with the continuing enrollment decreases is school budgets just continue to rise even though there are less kids to educate. I'm not saying the budgets should automatically decrease but I NEVER see a district decrease their budget. The magnitude of the decrease in MF is startling and if this is the start of the trend, which has been hinted at last year by the district, it raises significant issues. The MF budget still increased this year despite the large enrollment decrease (and that excludes the increase related to 4K and the referendum).
November 16, 2007 8:28 AM

Thinking Out Loud   

I thought that just maybe I was done posting on the MFSD enrollment issue. After all, the true numbers

November 16, 2007 8:54 AM

Ted Klumb   

The following was posted on another blog that posed the questions:

Am I unresponsive? Am I censoring my blog? This is my reply

Karen:

You emailed a question about why I didn't post your comment. Then you posted that I did not reply before I even read it. I have a full time job. I had a deal crash this week. I have, what seems like, a full time job on the board. I have a wife who is temporarily unable to walk. I value my family time like you, which is why you can't make our meetings so you could get the information first hand instead of expecting us to deliver it to you. By the way, I am missing family time and work time to go to these meetings and to serve the public, as are my other hard working board members.

If I went to every board meeting this week, it would have totaled 8 hours which is a few hours shy of the amount of time it took you to run out of patience and post that I did not reply. Throw in that I am new at this blog thing and have been having trouble posting comments and you have your answer. My blog is for my own personal recreation and expression. Sometimes give the citizens information and my opinions that might be meaningful to them. I will run it as I see fit and not turn it into my full time job.

PS Since you are so good at math try putting 2+2 together to figure out why nobody is running for public office. Please put your answer in the form of a solution – at YOUR convenience. I have to get back to work and put a deal back together.

November 16, 2007 11:35 AM

Andy Mohrfeld   

To your point about getting more jobs in this state, one of the best ways to do that is to lower taxes. I don't see any politicians in this state trying to do that. Wisconsin likes to talk about the wonderful education it provides its citizens. If its so wonderful, why aren't more people and companies moving here?
November 17, 2007 9:56 AM

Ted Klumb   

To Karen's question above:

I was very wrong about the percentage drop of those leaving the district. We are showing a reverse in the the trend in students leaving our district by their or their parents choice to do so.

Here are the official numbers provided by our staff:

The number of resident students last year leaving our District ( via Open Enrollment and Chapter 220) was 93 students, this year (07-08) the number of resident students leaving was 76 students a decrease of 17 resident students leaving.  This calculates to be about 18% fewer going out this year than last year.  In addition, we also had some residents students move away, relocate, to other Districts which added to the attrition rate.  In 2006-07 our total attrition rate was 11% this year it dropped to 8%

As far as her second question: Also, the district projected to lose only 37, but lost 142.  Are those projections accurate?  Should they be re-evaluated for accuracy? I suppose we could try but if you have been attending school board meetings on a regular basis you probably realize that we are adding and dropping items to project. We now have a new business manager who will probably want to do things his way-and will be accountable for the end result(s).

November 20, 2007 11:09 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs