WaukeshaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

359 Degrees

Scott has lived in Brookfield for over 20 years and has been 5th District alderman since 2000. This blog will try to round out the views on Brookfield presented by so many others.

Televising City Meetings

By Scott Berg
Friday, Apr 18 2008, 12:08 AM

One of the most significant changes to Brookfield government that I have been a part of is televising the meetings of the Council, Plan Commission and annual budget meetings.  It was a highly controversial topic at the time, but I think it turned out well. 

Televising was approved in concept on October 7, 2003.  The first video recorded meeting was June 15, 2004.  Televising was expanded to include the Plan Commission and annual finance meetings on October 5, 2004. (By the way, those are links to my aldermanic web site where searchable copies of almost all council minutes from April, 2000 to the present are publically available.  Due to the volume and size of the pages, a link is the easiest way to make it available to you.)  There was always opposition to televising from some aldermen due to fears of excessive cost, the potential of grandstanding, etc.  As with all legislative acts, it took a lot of work to build a majority and every vote counted, not just mine.

The meetings may be viewed on cable channel 25 for several days following the meeting.  On request, you may view a past meeting at the City Clerk's office in City Hall.  For a small fee, you can get a DVD copy of the meeting.

At the April 15, 2008 council meeting, I made a referral to expand the televising of meetings.  That means the city staff and the appropriate committee (in this case it will start in Finance) will study the idea and decide what to do about it.  The referral was:

To: Mayor Jeff Speaker

Date: April 10, 2008

Re: Meeting Audio / Video Streaming

This is a service request / legislative referral I will make at the April 15, 2008 Council meeting.

I request the City study expanding televising of city meetings.

  • Expand the televising program to all official meetings. This may be a phased implementation, but a specific program should be outlined, funded and scheduled.

  • Allow real time (live) internet based audio or video streaming of certain meetings. Council and Plan Commission meetings would be good candidates. The City of Waukesha telecasts the Council and Plan Commission meetings live. Waukesha County Supervisor meetings are audiocast.

  • Allow video streaming on demand for past meetings. If YouTube can do it, so can we.

Here is a link to a PDF of the submitted referral:   Referrals_20080415_Televising.pdf

There has been a continuing problem with the sound for meeting.  This is mostly due to the fact that the aldermen do not speak directly into their microphones.  Due to the arrangement of the desks, aldermen in the front row tend to turn around to talk to their colleagues which means they are facing away from their microphones.  There has been some discussion of remodeling the council room to arrange the desks into a horseshoe so that everyone will naturally look toward the audience which will also be towards their microphone.  There is no specific plan to do that now, though it may be part of the study I requested.

By the way, the television equipment was paid for with fees from Time-Warner Cable Company.  The cost of room remodeling is always tax dollars.

Filed under:
Permalink |  Mail to a friend

Comments

keng   

Why not get Time Warner to buy those little microphones that clip to your clothing? You would get better sound quality and save a remodeling.

 Scott's reply:

Yes, that's one option being considered.  There is the issue of avoiding picking up every sound the wearer is making.  e.g. shuffling papers, clearing throat, etc. In a TV studio you have a dedicated sound technician selecting which one microphone is "hot" to avoid that problem.

A remodelling could also address the common complaint that residents speaking to the council don't feel engaged since the aldermen are not clearly facing them.  Presentations (PowerPoint, maps, etc.) are also difficult for everyone to see in the current layout.

April 18, 2008 3:00 PM

Santa's Elf   

I would imagine that the little clip-ons would also pickup lots of 'under the breadth' commentary from the council members?

Also, why not feature the mayor live from nine to five? Could become sufficiently popular to warrant commercialization, raising money for the city.

Scott's reply:

Actually, there is remarkably little "under the breath" conversation.  You do see the occasional sidebar on procedural issues such as offering amendments to motions.

As for commercialization, check how other local bloggers plan to add to the family millions by selling advertisting on their blogs.  Did you elves get a lot of frequent flyer miles when helping Santa or is that another petty jealousy you want to rant about?

April 20, 2008 10:03 AM

Santa's Elf   

You seem to be unduly concerned about 'rants'. I generally reserve rants for situations that warrant them.

One such is the emerging architectural abortion on the corner of Capital and Beaufort which is quickly assuming all the ambiance of a federal prison, less the prison's intrinsic charm, of course!

Perhaps the only upside is the knowledge that the builder still owns most of the 'high end' condos trapped between the fowl habitat to the west - soon to attract DNR attention, I'm sure - and the cell block currently under construction along Capital Dr.

Just another example of our city council 'working' with the builder?

Scott's reply:

You have a point.  I think I'll just let you post what you will (short of obscenity) and let the readers decide if you have something to offer or if my replies to you  would just prove Mark Twain to be right about arguing. 

April 20, 2008 2:38 PM

Larry Knetzger   

Hi Scott, I would appreciate an internet broadcast of the municipal meetings. We do not have cable but use Dish for our TV. so no access to the meetings from our house. Internet would permit that and maybe make me more informed of what is going on instead of reading 1/2 truth's at Brookfield News or bloggers who just say their point of view. Not to over due this but there certainly could be an internet question and answer person that emails could be sent to during the meeting. This of course has some down fall to it. The council would not get home until 2 am in the morning because of the question and answer period. Just a FYI.

Scott's reply:

You have an interesting concept with the interactive meeting format.  How about having an interactive public information meeting (town hall format)?  The staff could present a topic(s) and questions would follow.  Several aldermen already have district meetings.

I have observed that many public hearings are lightly attended, yet the morning after the meeting the bloggers, breakfast clubs, letters to the editor, etc. have plenty to say, most of it based on a 6 inch newspaper story or less.  Since everything city officials say is, at least according to certain bloggers, incomplete and unreliable, how should the information be disseminated?

April 24, 2008 11:29 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs